Assignment Instructions

Justify and demonstrate appropriate leadership styles and skills necessary to effectively manage, evaluate and innovate healthcare services utilising contemporary local, national and international perspectives.

2.1 Justify and demonstrate appropriate leadership styles and skills necessary to effectively manage, evaluate and innovate healthcare services utilising contemporary local, national and international perspectives
Accountability
3.1 Create and lead social and ethical accountability to ensure efficient use of resources and equity of access to optimal and safe health care
3.2 Validate the importance of integrating stakeholder partnerships in all healthcare decision-making activities
Communication
4.1 Value and choose highly effective and sensitive communication with diverse populations to ensure positive and sustainable change in healthcare practice, policy and research
4.2 Determine and recommend modes of communication necessary to optimise outcomes across differing audiences, purposes and contexts within healthcare practice
Indigenous awareness
5.3 Recognise the diversity of Indigenous Australians and integrate this knowledge into practice [Synth]
Weighting: 30%
Due date: Monday 7 June 2020, 23:59 AEST (midnight)
Length: Maximum of 1500 words
Task: Develop a strategic plan for the next five years
References: APA 7th, no minimum number
Formatting requirements: 11pt, san-serif font (e.g. Calibri or Arial), double-spaced, 30mm margins, A4 pages
Scenario
Welcome to the world of the strategist.
You have been appointed the Director of Organisational Development for your organisation. The first thing you must do is develop a strategic plan for the next five years.
Assessment task
In this first phase of the development of your strategic plan:
• discuss the approaches you will use to develop your strategic plan
• outline the key variables that are driving your organisation’s development, including any challenges that it is facing
• clearly articulate a vision and mission statement and outline your goals and objectives for the next five years.
When you have completed your plan submit via Canvas. For more information on submission of assessments go to Canvas tutorials: Submitting your assessments.
Rubric
96336 Organisational Management in Health Care | Assessment 2 Rubric
96336 Organisational Management in Health Care | Assessment 2 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApproaches to the strategic planning process
Describes and justifies the approaches chosen for the strategic planning process 30 to 25.5 pts
HD (High distinction)
Succinct and clear description of rationale for choice of approaches for the strategic planning process. Justifies choice of approach based on scholarly, government and institutional literature and resources. 25.5 to 22.5 pts
D (Distinction)
Clear description of rationale for approaches chosen for the strategic planning process. Correct use of evidence-based literature for justification. 22.5 to 19.5 pts
C (Credit)
Description of the rationale for approaches chosen for the strategic planning process. The use of evidence-based literature is adequate to justify the selection of approaches however, further reading would enhance this section 19.5 to 15.0 pts
P (Pass)
Basic explanation of description rationale for approaches chosen for the strategic planning process. There is a superficial attempt to justify use of approaches based on evidence from the literature. 15 to 0 pts
X (Fail)
No/unclear explanation of rationale for approaches chosen for the strategic planning process healthcare system is measured. And/or no or irrelevant use of evidence-based literature to justify the selection of approaches.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies key variables
Identifies and justifies a comprehensive list of key variables driving organisational development 20 to 17.0 pts
HD (High distinction)
A succinct and clear description of the rationale for the choice of approaches for the strategic planning process. Justifies choice of an approach based on scholarly, government and institutional literature and resources. 17 to 14.0 pts
D (Distinction)
Clear description of the identification and justification of key variables driving organisational development. Correct use of evidence-based literature. 14 to 13.0 pts
C (Credit)
Description of the identification and justification of key variables driving organisational development. Use of evidence-based literature is adequate to support this section however, further reading will enhance this section. 13 to 10.0 pts
P (Pass)
Basic explanation of identification and justification of key variables driving organisational development. There is a superficial attempt to use evidence-based literature in this section. 10 to 0 pts
X (Fail)
No/unclear explanation of identification and justification of key variables driving organisational development. And/or no or irrelevant use of evidence-based literature to support this section.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpretation and linkage of relevant and current literature
Validates perspectives through correct interpretation and explicit linkage of relevant and current literature to the assessment focus 10 to 8.5 pts
HD (High distinction)
Explicit links between the strategic planning process and a review of the literature. 8.5 to 7.0 pts
D (Distinction)
Link between the strategic planning process the literature is described. 7 to 6.5 pts
C (Credit)
Link between the strategic planning process and literature is apparent. 6.5 to 5.0 pts
P (Pass)
Link between the strategic planning process and the literature is somewhat apparent. 5 to 0 pts
X (Fail)
Limited or no description of the strategic planning process.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticulate vision and mission statements
Clearly articulate vision and mission statements that are appropriate to the organisation 10 to 8.5 pts
HD (High distinction)
Vision and mission statements are clearly described. Vision and mission statements are appropriate to the organisation and the strategic plan. appropriate and explicit. 8.5 to 7.0 pts
D (Distinction)
Vision and mission statements are clearly described and relevance to the organisation is clear. 7 to 6.5 pts
C (Credit)
Vision and mission statements are described and relevance to the organisation is apparent. 6.5 to 5.0 pts
P (Pass)
Vision and mission statements are described and relevance to the organisation is somewhat apparent. 5 to 0 pts
X (Fail)
Vision and mission statements are not described or relevance to the organisation is not apparent.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation of strategic goals and objectives
Identify and present strategic goals and objectives relevant to their organisation 20 to 17.0 pts
HD (High distinction)
Strategic goals are clearly described. Goals are appropriate to the organisation and the strategic plan. Relevance to the organisation is explicit. 17 to 14.0 pts
D (Distinction)
Strategic goals are clearly described and relevance to the organisation is clear. 14 to 13.0 pts
C (Credit)
Strategic goals are described and relevance to the organisation is apparent. 13 to 10.0 pts
P (Pass)
Strategic goals are described and relevance to the organisation is somewhat apparent. 10 to 0 pts
X (Fail)
Strategic goals are not described or relevance to the organisation is not apparent.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, styling and referencing
Produces correct grammar, spelling, formatting, style and referencing. 10 to 8.5 pts
HD (High distinction)
Fluent writing style with consistent report-style formatting, use of headings and sub-headings, and accurate referencing. 8.5 to 7.0 pts
D (Distinction)
Clear language with consistent formatting, use of headings and sub-headings, and accurate referencing. 7 to 6.5 pts
C (Credit)
Generally clear language with mainly consistent formatting and few errors in referencing. 6.5 to 5.0 pts
P (Pass)
Writing is less clear, with deficits in spelling, grammar, punctuation or referencing. Inconsistent formatting. 5 to 0 pts
X (Fail)
Writing is unclear, with numerous deficits in spelling, grammar, punctuation, formatting, or referencing.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext

Justify and demonstrate appropriate leadership styles and skills necessary to effectively manage, evaluate and innovate healthcare services utilising contemporary local, national and international perspectives

Calculate Price


Price (USD)
$

Why Choose Us For Your Assignment?

Privacy

We value all our customers' privacy. For that reason, all information stays private and confidential and will never be shared with third parties.

Punctuality

With our service you will never miss a deadline. We use strict follow-ups with our writers to ensure that all papers are submitted on time.

Authenticity

We have no tolerance for plagiarism. All papers go through thorough checking to ensure that no assignments contain plagiarism.

Money Back

You feel unsatisfied with your results? No worries. We offer refunds to our customers if any paper is not written according to the instructions.

Clients Love Us

Client #121678
Client #121678
Read More
This is by far the best I have ever scored in a custom essay. I am surprised the writer handled this assignment so well despite the short notice. I will definitely use your service next time.
Client #21702
Client #21702
Read More
When I was recommended to you by my friends, I wasn't sure you could deliver excellent results for Masters research papers until I submitted my first order. I am all yours now.
Client #20730
Client #20730
Read More
Excellent Services! You are the only assignment helper I can rely on. I have worked with many before and your services are exceptional. I have recommended you to my friends and the results are similar.
Client #20387
Client #20387
Read More
I rarely write reviews online but your services are worth promoting. My paper was so urgent I was sure I was gonna miss the deadline but you turned things around. You are awesome!
Client #20189
Client #20189
Read More
I am a satisfied customer. I know I should have given a 5 star because you deserve it but I will give 4.6 because I almost missed a deadline because of a revision. Luckily it was minor and the writer acted promptly.
Client #20187
Client #20187
Read More
Great paper but there is still some room for improvement. I am impressed by your fast responses and how you tacked my concerns professionally. Thank you for being among the few genuine essay writing service providers.
Client #19783
Client #19783
Read More
I can't thank you enough for being a great part of my college life. I recommended you to two more of my friends. I am sure they will be making their orders soon. I love the fact that you offer free pages for referrals. I will be referring a few more and maybe I won't have to pay for my next two paper, LOL.
Previous
Next