Assignment Instructions

Word limit: 1000 words Reference style: APA Reference style Australian syllabus Assessment Task Description This assignment is an in-depth analysis of accounting standard setting process and accounting practices around the globe. The marking rubric below sets out the requirements: Principally you will be marked on four components: (1) In-depth discussion on accountings standard setting process (2) In-depth discussion on global accountings practices (3) In detailed analysis of whether accounting standards are set for the global practices (4) Format, Presentation Quality and Demonstration of Research (10 marks for each component) As mentioned above, Part 1 should be presented in an academic paper format. A key aspect in your choice of format/layout should be to ensure you impart your key messages effectively (i.e., complete the requirements) and efficiently (i.e., it should be succinct and take into account the word limit). Make sure all pages are numbered, and the text fits within the margins of your pages. make sure to include the relevant heading. Required: Explain why the standardisation of accounting standards on a global basis does (or does not) necessarily equate with a standardisation in accounting practice. Couch your discussion to cover the four points indicated above.   Marking Criteria and Rubric Met Met Met Met Did not met requirements of requirement of requirement of requirement of requirement the learning the learning the learning the learning (0 to 49%) outcomes a, b ,c, outcomes a, b outcomes a, b ,c, outcomes a, b d, and e to an ,c, d, and e to a d, and e to a ,c, d, and e to excellent level very good level good level satisfactory (80 to 100%) (70 to 79%) (60 to 69%) level (50 to 59%) Part 1 (out of Fully Soundly A good All points Did not cover 10 marks) researched researched development were covered all points and and covered of all points thoroughly all points covered all r R equirements in depth and detail Part 2 (out of Fully Soundly A good Did not cover 10 marks) researched researched development All points all points and and covered of all points were covered thoroughly all points covered all r R equirements in depth and Part 3 (out of Fully Soundly A good Did not cover 10 marks) researched researched development All points all points and and covered of all points were covered thoroughly all points covered all r R equirements in depth and Part 4 (out of Proper Proper Basic Poor 10 marks) structure structure and structure and Readable grammar and language and language and grammar and language little or no grammar and good evidence of Some research full evidence evidence of research evidence of of supporting research research research Grand Total Mark (Out of 40) Unit Mark Contribution (Out of 10%). Word limit: 1000 words
Reference style: APA Reference style
Australian syllabus
 
 
Assessment Task Description
 
 
This assignment is an in-depth analysis of accounting standard setting process and accounting practices around the globe.
 
The marking rubric below sets out the requirements:
 
Principally you will be marked on four components:
 

  • In-depth discussion on accountings standard setting process

 

  • In-depth discussion on global accountings practices

 

  • In detailed analysis of whether accounting standards are set for the global practices

 

  • Format, Presentation Quality and Demonstration of Research (10 marks for each component)

 
As mentioned above, Part 1 should be presented in an academic paper format.
 
A key aspect in your choice of format/layout should be to ensure you impart your key messages effectively (i.e., complete the requirements) and efficiently (i.e., it should be succinct and take into account the word limit).
 
Make sure all pages are numbered, and the text fits within the margins of your pages. make sure to include the relevant heading.
 
Required:
Explain why the standardisation of accounting standards on a global basis does (or does not)
necessarily equate with a standardisation in accounting practice.
 
Couch your discussion to cover the four points indicated above.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Marking Criteria and Rubric    
         
  MetMetMetMetDid not met
  requirements ofrequirement ofrequirement ofrequirement ofrequirement
  the learningthe learningthe learningthe learning(0 to 49%)
  outcomes a, b ,c,outcomes a, boutcomes a, b ,c,outcomes a, b 
  d, and e to an,c, d, and e to ad, and e to a,c, d, and e to 
  excellent levelvery good levelgood levelsatisfactory 
  (80 to 100%)(70 to 79%)(60 to 69%)level 
       (50 to 59%) 
Part 1 (out of FullySoundlyA goodAll pointsDid not cover
10 marks) researchedresearcheddevelopmentwere coveredall points
  andand coveredof all points  
  thoroughlyall points   
  covered all    
  rRequirements    
  in depth and    
  detail    
Part 2 (out of FullySoundlyA good Did not cover
10 marks) researchedresearcheddevelopmentAll pointsall points
  andand coveredof all pointswere covered 
  thoroughlyall points   
  covered all    
  rRequirements    
  in depth and    
Part 3 (out of FullySoundlyA good Did not cover
10 marks) researchedresearcheddevelopmentAll pointsall points
  andand coveredof all pointswere covered 
  thoroughlyall points   
  covered all    
  rRequirements    
  in depth and    
Part 4 (out of ProperProperBasic Poor
10 marks) structurestructure andstructure andReadablegrammar and
  language andlanguage andgrammar andlanguagelittle or no
  grammar andgoodevidence ofSomeresearch
  full evidenceevidence ofresearchevidence of 
  of supportingresearch research 
  research    
Grand Total        
Mark (Out of        
40)        
Unit Mark        
Contribution        
(Out of 10%)        
         

 

Word limit: 1000 words Reference style: APA Reference style Australian syllabus Assessment Task Description This assignment is an in-depth analysis of accounting standard setting process and accounting practices around the globe. The marking rubric below sets out the requirements: Principally you will be marked on four components: (1) In-depth discussion on accountings standard setting process (2) In-depth discussion on global accountings practices (3) In detailed analysis of whether accounting standards are set for the global practices (4) Format, Presentation Quality and Demonstration of Research (10 marks for each component) As mentioned above, Part 1 should be presented in an academic paper format. A key aspect in your choice of format/layout should be to ensure you impart your key messages effectively (i.e., complete the requirements) and efficiently (i.e., it should be succinct and take into account the word limit). Make sure all pages are numbered, and the text fits within the margins of your pages. make sure to include the relevant heading. Required: Explain why the standardisation of accounting standards on a global basis does (or does not) necessarily equate with a standardisation in accounting practice. Couch your discussion to cover the four points indicated above.   Marking Criteria and Rubric Met Met Met Met Did not met requirements of requirement of requirement of requirement of requirement the learning the learning the learning the learning (0 to 49%) outcomes a, b ,c, outcomes a, b outcomes a, b ,c, outcomes a, b d, and e to an ,c, d, and e to a d, and e to a ,c, d, and e to excellent level very good level good level satisfactory (80 to 100%) (70 to 79%) (60 to 69%) level (50 to 59%) Part 1 (out of Fully Soundly A good All points Did not cover 10 marks) researched researched development were covered all points and and covered of all points thoroughly all points covered all r R equirements in depth and detail Part 2 (out of Fully Soundly A good Did not cover 10 marks) researched researched development All points all points and and covered of all points were covered thoroughly all points covered all r R equirements in depth and Part 3 (out of Fully Soundly A good Did not cover 10 marks) researched researched development All points all points and and covered of all points were covered thoroughly all points covered all r R equirements in depth and Part 4 (out of Proper Proper Basic Poor 10 marks) structure structure and structure and Readable grammar and language and language and grammar and language little or no grammar and good evidence of Some research full evidence evidence of research evidence of of supporting research research research Grand Total Mark (Out of 40) Unit Mark Contribution (Out of 10%)

Calculate Price


Price (USD)
$

Why Choose Us For Your Assignment?

Privacy

We value all our customers' privacy. For that reason, all information stays private and confidential and will never be shared with third parties.

Punctuality

With our service you will never miss a deadline. We use strict follow-ups with our writers to ensure that all papers are submitted on time.

Authenticity

We have no tolerance for plagiarism. All papers go through thorough checking to ensure that no assignments contain plagiarism.

Money Back

You feel unsatisfied with your results? No worries. We offer refunds to our customers if any paper is not written according to the instructions.

Clients Love Us

Client #121678
Client #121678
Read More
This is by far the best I have ever scored in a custom essay. I am surprised the writer handled this assignment so well despite the short notice. I will definitely use your service next time.
Client #21702
Client #21702
Read More
When I was recommended to you by my friends, I wasn't sure you could deliver excellent results for Masters research papers until I submitted my first order. I am all yours now.
Client #20730
Client #20730
Read More
Excellent Services! You are the only assignment helper I can rely on. I have worked with many before and your services are exceptional. I have recommended you to my friends and the results are similar.
Client #20387
Client #20387
Read More
I rarely write reviews online but your services are worth promoting. My paper was so urgent I was sure I was gonna miss the deadline but you turned things around. You are awesome!
Client #20189
Client #20189
Read More
I am a satisfied customer. I know I should have given a 5 star because you deserve it but I will give 4.6 because I almost missed a deadline because of a revision. Luckily it was minor and the writer acted promptly.
Client #20187
Client #20187
Read More
Great paper but there is still some room for improvement. I am impressed by your fast responses and how you tacked my concerns professionally. Thank you for being among the few genuine essay writing service providers.
Client #19783
Client #19783
Read More
I can't thank you enough for being a great part of my college life. I recommended you to two more of my friends. I am sure they will be making their orders soon. I love the fact that you offer free pages for referrals. I will be referring a few more and maybe I won't have to pay for my next two paper, LOL.
Previous
Next